Which response format asks respondents to choose the score (for example 1 to 5) that best represents their level of agreement?

Which response format asks respondents to choose the score (for example 1 to 5) that best represents their level of agreement?

• A. Likert-type scale
• B. Thurstone scale
• C. Semantic differential
• D. Response acquiescence set

Answer: (A)

The main idea is rating how strongly someone agrees with a statement using a multi-point scale. The best answer is a Likert-type scale, which presents statements and asks respondents to indicate their level of agreement on a scale (commonly 5 or 7 points, from strongly disagree to strongly agree). This format is specifically designed to measure attitudes or opinions along a continuum of agreement, making it the classic choice for capturing degree of agreement with a single statement. The other formats work differently: the Thurstone scale involves pre-rated items and weighted judgments to build a scale, not simply choosing an agreement level for one statement; the semantic differential uses opposite adjectives on a scale to gauge attitudes across multiple bipolar dimensions rather than a direct agreement with a single item; and a response acquiescence set is a potential bias where respondents tend to agree with statements, not a distinct format for expressing agreement.

The main idea is rating how strongly someone agrees with a statement using a multi-point scale. The best answer is a Likert-type scale, which presents statements and asks respondents to indicate their level of agreement on a scale (commonly 5 or 7 points, from strongly disagree to strongly agree). This format is specifically designed to measure attitudes or opinions along a continuum of agreement, making it the classic choice for capturing degree of agreement with a single statement. The other formats work differently: the Thurstone scale involves pre-rated items and weighted judgments to build a scale, not simply choosing an agreement level for one statement; the semantic differential uses opposite adjectives on a scale to gauge attitudes across multiple bipolar dimensions rather than a direct agreement with a single item; and a response acquiescence set is a potential bias where respondents tend to agree with statements, not a distinct format for expressing agreement.